
What Does “Military Spouse Friendly” Actually Mean?
“Military spouse friendly” has become a popular phrase.
It appears on job postings, company career pages, and job announcements to signal a commitment to hiring military spouses. It’s great that more, and more employers recognize the value military spouses bring to the workforce, but hiring a military spouse is far from deserving a military spouse-friendly designation. That designation should be reserved for employers willing to put in the work to keep military spouses employed when military life inevitably gets complicated. (Because it will).
I’ve learned that lesson many times throughout my career. Like the time I spent a year and a half waiting for my dream position to open, only to apply, finally get the job, and then get a call from my husband two weeks later saying we had permanent change of station (PCS) orders that summer.
Or the time I went through three interviews for a position before being invited in to meet the team. Everything seemed to be going well until a team member asked about all the different locations on my resume, and what had taken me all over the country. When I explained that my husband was an active-duty soldier, I learned the person I would be replacing was also a military spouse who had left because of a PCS. Suddenly, all those locations on my resume seemed to matter a lot more.
I never heard from the organization again. Eventually, I saw the position reposted.
I can’t say for certain that finding out I was a military spouse changed their decision. But I can understand why an employer who had just lost an employee to a PCS might hesitate at the thought of hiring another military spouse. What if I left too?
And that’s exactly the problem.
If employers want to hire military spouses, they also must accept that our connection to the military doesn’t disappear once the onboarding paperwork is signed. Eventually, orders may come. A deployment may change everything at home. Childcare may fall through. Another duty station may be in our future.
Being military spouse friendly isn’t about pretending those things won’t happen. It’s about what an employer does when they do.
Hiring us is only the beginning.
Hiring military spouses is important. But the bigger question is what happens after?
What happens when that employee walks into her supervisor’s office and says their family just received orders? Is the first conversation about their resignation date? Or is it about figuring out how to keep her?
Can their position be done remotely?
Is there another office near the new duty station?
Is there another position within the company that would allow them to stay?
The answer to all those questions, unfortunately, may be no, but the difference here is between not being able to make something work and never trying.
Sometimes none of those options will work. Some jobs cannot move with an employee, and there are legitimate reasons an organization may not be able to employ someone in another state. But there is a big difference between not being able to make something work and never trying. That, to me, is what the “military spouse friendly” should mean.
Stop seeing our resumes as a warning sign.
If you looked at my resume, you wouldn’t see a few positions scattered within the same state or even the same region. You would see my first position in Maryland, followed by a job in Washington State, then back across the country to New Jersey, then Colorado, and finally Georgia.
That question I got during the meet-and-greet wasn’t unusual. When you’ve moved around the country because of the military, your resume tells that story whether you want it to or not.
Different cities. Different states. Different employers.
To someone unfamiliar with military life, it can look like a candidate who has trouble staying put. To a military spouse, it may represent years of trying very hard to do exactly the opposite.
Every move means figuring out the job market again. It means rebuilding a professional network, learning which employers are in the area, and sometimes accepting a position that isn’t necessarily the next logical step in your career because it’s the best opportunity available where you are.
Then, when you’ve built your way back up, another set of orders can arrive.
That doesn’t make military spouses unreliable employees. It means we have careers that have had to bend around circumstances largely outside of our control. If employers genuinely want military spouse talent, they must be willing to look at the experiences behind all those locations instead of treating them as a red flag.
Career portability matters more than hiring programs
For years, one of the hardest parts of being a military spouse was knowing that almost every PCS could mean starting over, and then remote work changed that.
Suddenly, moving didn’t necessarily mean resigning. Military spouses could keep the same job, with the same employer, even when the military sent their families hundreds or thousands of miles away.
For military families, that is huge.
But a remote job and a portable job aren’t necessarily the same.
Can the employee move to another state and keep the position? Does the company already employ people there? Is the role tied to a specific geographic area even though the employee works from home? What happens if the company’s remote-work policy changes?
Those aren’t questions most employees must think about when accepting a job. Military spouses do.
Because when you’ve already rebuilt your career several times, you start looking at opportunities differently. You’re not only thinking about whether you want the job now. You’re wondering whether you’ll still be able to continue in that position if the next set of orders comes two years from now, and employers that truly want to support military spouses should be thinking about that too.
Experience shouldn’t reset with every PCS
Another mistake I’ve seen over, and over again in discussions around military spouse employment is when we’re treated as if we’re all at the beginning of our careers. We’re not.
Some spouses are entering the workforce for the first time. Some are returning after some time away. Some are changing careers or need help translating their experience into a new industry. And some have spent 10, 15, or 20 years building careers. A PCS doesn’t erase that experience.
Yet military spouses can find themselves starting over professionally every time their family moves. Maybe there aren’t comparable positions near the new installation. Maybe a professional license doesn’t transfer easily. Maybe the spouse takes a lower-level position because it’s better than leaving the workforce altogether.
They work their way back up, start gaining momentum again, and then it’s time to pack up and head to the next place.
Repeat that cycle several times, and the impact becomes much bigger than having a few extra employers listed on a resume. It affects salary growth, promotions, retirement savings, and the ability to compete for increasingly senior positions.
Being military spouse friendly means recognizing the experience someone brings, not treating every PCS as a professional reset button.
Flexibility isn’t special treatment
Military spouses don’t need employers to lower their expectations for us. We need employers who understand that every once in a while, military life is going to collide with work. Deployments happen. PCS dates change. Orders get amended. Childcare plans that worked with two parents suddenly don’t work with one. Household goods don’t show up when they’re supposed to. School schedules don’t line up between states.
Most military spouses become pretty good at figuring it out. But sometimes we need flexibility while we do.
That might mean temporarily adjusting a schedule during a deployment, allowing someone to work remotely during part of a PCS, or sometimes simply having a supervisor willing to sit down and talk through the options instead of assuming military life automatically means the employee can’t do the job.
That isn’t lowering the bar. It’s recognizing that good employees sometimes need flexibility.
Don’t just hire military spouses – invest in them
One more piece of this gets lost in the conversation about military spouse employment: military spouses don’t just want jobs. We want careers. We want promotions. We want leadership opportunities. We want professional development. We want to take on bigger projects and build expertise. And employers shouldn’t be afraid to invest in us because the military could move our family.
Any employee could leave. Someone might get a better offer. Their spouse could get a job in another state. They might decide to change careers. Their family circumstances might change. Military spouses have one of those possibilities printed a little more visibly on our resumes.
Passing over a military spouse for an opportunity because she might move someday doesn’t prevent turnover. It just limits what she can contribute while she’s there.
And if employers build workplaces where military spouses can take their careers with them, moving doesn’t necessarily have to mean losing that employee anyway.
So, to answer the question I started out this blog with, “What does “military spouse-friendly” actually mean?”
To me, it isn’t a logo on a careers page:
It’s what happens when an employee says, “We got orders.”
It’s the hiring manager who sees five states on a resume and wants to know what experience they gained in each one, instead of wondering how quickly the candidate will leave.
It’s considering whether a job can move with an employee before assuming it can’t. It’s hiring an experienced military spouse into a position that reflects that experience.
It’s giving military spouses opportunities to advance instead of viewing them as temporary employees.
And sometimes it’s simply being willing to have a conversation before deciding something won’t work.
No employer can eliminate all the career challenges that come with military life. There will always be positions that can’t move, circumstances employers can’t accommodate, and times when a military spouse has no choice but to leave a job; we’re used to that.
Military spouses have spent years figuring out how to make careers work around the needs of the military. We’ve rebuilt professional networks, changed industries, taken steps backward, started over, and found ways to keep moving forward. We need more employers willing to meet us somewhere in the middle.
Hiring a military spouse is a good start. But if you’re going to call yourself military spouse-friendly, show us what happens after you hire one.
